Federal Judge Blocks Key Provisions of Trump's Elections Executive Order: A Constitutional Crisis Over Presidential Authority
Introduction
A federal judge in Massachusetts has delivered one of the most significant legal rebukes to presidential authority over elections in recent memory, blocking the vast majority of provisions in President Trump's sweeping executive order that sought to fundamentally restructure how Americans vote. The ruling by U.S. District Judge Denise Casper represents a decisive assertion of constitutional principles, emphasizing that the power to regulate elections rests with Congress and the states, not the executive branch. This landmark decision affects 19 states that challenged the order and marks the second major federal court ruling against Trump's election reforms, following a similar decision by a judge in Washington, D.C. The case has emerged as a defining battle over the separation of powers, federalism, and the future of American electoral democracy.